Scientists map underground fungal network: 109 quintillion km of threads
Scientists have begun mapping in detail the underground network of fungal filaments, which measures 68 quadrillion miles (approximately 109 quintillion km) in length. It is the largest known infrastructure structure on Earth — larger than all roads, cables and shipping routes combined. The network is alive and plays a crucial role in ecosystem functioning. The map covers North America among other areas.
Full text
Directly beneath our feet stretches a world both smaller and much, much larger than the one we know. Scientists have just begun mapping what may well be the largest piece of infrastructure on Earth: a network of fungal threads that is 68 quadrillion miles long.
It’s alive!
And we thought we’d mapped just about everything there is to map on this planet: continents, voting patterns, bird migration routes, alleged apparitions of the Virgin Mary, and Starbucks locations near you.
We’ve logged and named almost every fold of the visible world. And yet until June, the most extensive piece of infrastructure on the planet had not been extensively mapped. This network is larger than every road, cable, and shipping lane combined. And it’s alive .
A map of the fungal network in North America; on the right, a close-up of its capital –Florida. ( Credit : SPUN/A Hidden Infrastructure)
To be precise: It’s fungal. This underground network is made of so-called hyphae : hair-thin filaments that knit together into vast structures known as mycelium . A large fraction of these fungi form partnerships with the roots of plants and trees. Roughly 70% of all botanical species indulge in these relationships.
Think of these relationships, also known as mycorrhizae , not so much as tender friendships, but as shrewd trade agreements: Both parties get something indispensable out of it. The plant can make sugar from sunlight, but is bad at foraging. So the fungus provides phosphorus, nitrogen, and water. The fungus is a foraging superhero, but cannot photosynthesize. So the plant repays the fungus in carbon.
How to survive on land
The arrangement is not new — it dates back several hundred million years, to when plants were first figuring out how to survive on land. What’s new is that scientists have now learned to map the actual shape and extent of that arrangement.
Writing in Science in June, a team including members of the Society for the Protection of Underground Networks ( SPUN ), estimated that the top 15 centimeters of the planet’s soils hold roughly 110 quadrillion kilometers of so-called arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal hyphae .
The map shows surprising variations in network density: high in the north of Ireland and Great Britain, low in the south of both islands (left); and strangely absent from Poland, in contrast to its neighbors (right). ( Credit : SPUN/A Hidden Infrastructure)
That distance in miles sounds no less deranged: 68 quadrillion. But to get some sense of the vastness of that funny-sounding number, imagine laying those filaments end to end, in which case they would stretch from the Earth to the Sun close to a billion times. No use: that’s still an absurdly large mental object to wrap your head around.
Another way of gauging the network’s size is to consider its weight instead of its length. In total, it is estimated to weigh around 300 million tons, which, the authors write, is roughly five times the biomass of all humans on Earth combined.
How could we have missed such a massive network? Well, it’s also extremely tiny — a teaspoon of soil can hold up to 10 meters of fungal hyphae, each fragment so thin as to be practically invisible.
4 billion tons of CO2
To map something this humungous and diaphanous, researchers had to develop a new mapping discipline — a cartography of dirt. They collected and analyzed 16,000 soil samples from all over the world, extrapolating this map from the data they gathered.
Easy to lose behind those quadrillion miles of living filaments is another big number. The fungal network moves around four billion tons of carbon dioxide equivalent into the soil each year. That is equivalent to 11% of humanity’s annual emissions. For a structure that few people knew about until a few months ago, the global fungal network is doing good work on a planetary scale.
No fungal network in the Arabian Desert, but the Fertile Crescent is underlapped (yes, that is a word) by a fungal twin. On the right: the Tibetan plateau is a hotbed of hyphae filaments ( Credit : SPUN/A Hidden Infrastructure)
That talent for burying CO2 may be why we will finally pay attention to this subterranean layer of life, beginning with this eerily glowing map of what has already been called the “fungal internet,” published by SPUN.
Although still incomplete, the map already offers some surprises. If you had to guess where Earth’s fungal network was densest, “rainforests” sounds like a reasonable answer: lushly layered flora, thick with roots. But no. The map points to grasslands as the hotbed of fungal filaments — as much as 40% of the world’s arbuscular mycorrhizal network is buried beneath the waving fields of grass of the Tibetan Plateau, and the flooded grasslands of the Everglades and South Sudan, among other places.
(Not quite the) Wood Wide Web
That’s a consequential discovery. On the whole, grasslands are treated as one of the least appealing biomes. By escaping scrutiny, they are more vulnerable to exploitation: It’s estimated that grasslands are being converted into agricultural land four times faster than forests are. Farmed soil carries only half the network density of wild ecosystems, the SPUN-led survey found.
The fact that so much of the world’s fungal infrastructure lies beneath waving fields of grass may help protect them. Or it may not — most are not legally safeguarded.
Is there a way to protect and conserve something that’s alive and plays a crucial role in the ecosystem, but is also invisible to the naked eye, and distributed over half the world?
The prevalence of the fungal network is highly responsive to elevation. You can clearly see the contours of the Appalachians (left) on the North American map, and of the Pyrennees and Alps on the European one (right). ( Credit : SPUN/A Hidden Infrastructure)
One answer would be to latch on to the public imagination and align this network with the “Wood Wide Web” — a term popularized over the past decade to mean that forests are laced together by fungal networks that allow trees to communicate with each other and share resources.
It’s a great story, and not wholly without scientific merit, but we currently understand too little of these networks to fit them so neatly into a comparison with the actual internet. (We are forever embarrassing ourselves by inventing comparisons that are as inadequate as they are easily antiquated.)
Part of the issue is that the fungi in question are not merely conduits, not the organic equivalent of fiberoptic cable. They’re living organisms in their own right and with their own “agenda,” not simply here to ensure the trees can communicate with each other — if that is indeed what they are doing.
The main thing this map can and should do, is change the way we think about the ground beneath our feet, a worthy enough task as it is. Land that looks empty may well be teeming with life, albeit right under the surface. Soil is not just the solid foundation of our world, but itself a layer filled with living creatures — just not how most of us think living creatures look like.
Cartographers of bygone days used to fill the unmapped corners of the world with monsters, shorthand for “we don’t know.” This map has filled in an unexpected blank on the map with a different kind of creature, more amazing than monstrous: simultaneously microscopic and gargantuan, and probably still with lots to teach us about the world we share with them.
Strange Maps #1301
Got a strange map? Let me know at strangemaps@gmail.com .
Follow Strange Maps on X and Facebook .
This article Scientists map massive layer of life just beneath our feet is featured on Big Think .
Should protection of underground fungal networks be a priority of environmental policy?
Comments
No comments yet
Comments
No comments yet — be the first to weigh in 👇
No comments yet. Be the first!