Europe must act now to secure AI sovereignty

Full text

Discussions about technological sovereignty in Europe can tend towards doomerism. It is easy to see why. A handful of hyper-scalers in the US and China control the foundational infrastructure of the modern world. The reliance on these technologies from companies and governments in Europe grows with each week that passes.

Near-total dependence on foreign-hosted and trained AI models presents a massive national security risk. If there isn’t a sovereign layer to your infrastructure, you don’t have control over the future. What if the plug is pulled or if security is compromised?

These are the nightmare scenarios being discussed in boardrooms and government departments across the continent.

And yet, Europe has many reasons to feel optimistic in its pursuit of sovereignty. Perhaps the LLM ship has sailed, but it is what comes next that is truly exciting.

In areas such as quantum computing and robotics – and their application across industries including healthcare and climate science – there is evidence that Europe’s combination of engineering talent and deep customer/market knowledge is laying the foundation for the next wave of society-shaping innovation.

This goes to the heart of what AI sovereignty really means: developing a technology that is both a great product, with no compromise on efficiency and scalability, while also solving the biggest possible problems of today or tomorrow.

A time for action

Now is the time to act. Sovereignty, particularly AI sovereignty, is an absolute priority for European governments and, increasingly, for customers and the public as geopolitical tensions escalate. We are already seeing many examples of companies in Europe building parallel IT infrastructure where they would usually be dependent on hyperscalers. There is also a growing trend towards on-premise cloud and data solutions, in a bid to create sovereign solutions.

So the question is, can we, those of us outside the US and China, build the best products that solve the most pressing problems? The answer is a resounding yes, but we need to ensure that our approach isn’t purely defensive. True sovereignty is about more than having the right level of regulation to protect ourselves against external systems we can’t control. If we want to be sustainable, we need to build alternatives that are at least as good; if we compromise on that, it will fail.

If we take healthcare as an example of sovereignty. It is one of the most sensitive industries when it comes to data, given how personal and confidential medical data is. If your life were dependent on an AI solution that could help define the best personalized or predictive care, and that solution was not sovereign, would you hesitate? Of course not. It is a big problem, but there are companies out there nearing a solution.

A fantastic example of this is the French scale-up ALAN, which is increasingly disrupting the whole medical insurance market thanks to a truly end-to-end designed business process. We need to play to our strengths in these use-case areas where technology has a life-changing impact. In June this year, it announced that it had raised €480m, valuing the company at €5.5bn.

Hindering factors

There are, of course, some factors that might hinder our progress, such as overregulation and the constraints that entrepreneurs face. We cannot ignore the challenge of funding; the US benefits from a $30 trillion pension fund that flows massively into the PE and VC markets. We are far away from that in Europe, and we must find solutions urgently.

There are some positive developments, such as the European Union’s flagship €95.5 billion R&D funding program, Horizon Europe, which supports 200-300 groundbreaking scientific discoveries annually across the EU and the UK. But these initiatives are still relatively small and only represent a step in the right direction.

And Europe’s unique digital market is still not as easy to address as the single US or Chinese market. From my experience on the boards of several European scaleups, many of them find it easier to attack the US market once they’ve gained momentum in their home country than to attack another European country. Ultimately, all of these problems need to be solved.

It is also vital that we choose our battles. We shouldn’t be chasing after American or Chinese LLMs or hyperscalers. We will waste time trying to play catch-up. The reality is that we have a proven track record in use case-driven areas, such as healthcare, and that is where we must focus.

Our approach must be to anticipate where the market is moving. Two areas that are emerging as potentially revolutionary are quantum and robotics. The US is already hedging its bets. President Trump recently signed a bill mandating that the US will have a quantum computer by 2028 and requiring that cyber systems adopt post-quantum crypto-consistent solutions. This is what sovereignty is: it’s not hyperscalers; it’s technology that will significantly impact everyone's lives.

The good news is that in Europe, we have many examples of startups producing world-leading technology in quantum and robotics. Ultimately, the success of sovereignty will depend on our ability to build the best products in Europe to solve our greatest problems. We won’t be sustainable if the ‘sovereign’ alternative isn’t as good as the solutions developed elsewhere. In Europe, we have all the tools to achieve sovereignty. But we must act now.

Manage your data with the best business cloud storage .

This article was produced as part of TechRadar Pro Perspectives , our channel to feature the best and brightest minds in the technology industry today.

The views expressed here are those of the author and are not necessarily those of TechRadarPro or Future plc. If you are interested in contributing find out more here: https://www.techradar.com/pro/perspectives-how-to-submit