First 48-team World Cup: more stories, less quality — a mixed verdict
The first 48-team World Cup, won by Spain after 104 games across five and a half weeks in North America, delivered new stories and underdog moments alongside glaring gaps in class between sides. The expansion fulfilled Maradona's dream of broadening participation but proved Löw's concern about diluting quality. Debate has already begun over whether a 64-team edition could be next.
Full text
The first 48-team World Cup had its positives and negatives – do we need to brace for a 64-team future?
It was less than 12 months after Gianni Infantino succeeded Sepp Blatter as president that Fifa announced the expansion of the men’s World Cup from 32 to 48 teams. The reaction was mixed. Diego Maradona said he was “delighted by Gianni’s initiative” because it allowed each country to dream of reaching the tournament, renewing their passion for football. Joachim Löw, then in charge of world champions Germany, said: “I don’t think it’s a good idea to dilute the sporting value … In the long term, the quality suffers.”
On the evidence of the first 48-team edition, won by Spain after 104 games across five-and-a-half weeks in North America, it’s fair to conclude Maradona and Löw both had a point.
Continue reading...
Comments
No comments yet
What's wrong?
Comments
No comments yet — be the first to weigh in 👇
💬
No comments yet. Be the first!
Swipe up
⚡
You're all caught up
You've seen all the latest stories. Check back later for more.
Comments
No comments yet — be the first to weigh in 👇
No comments yet. Be the first!