FlashFeed

Full text

Ukrainians reportedly manipulate Russian fuel maps through coordinated online participation

Over a million users visit the website behind the fuel map campaign

Digital platforms become another battlefield during ongoing geopolitical conflicts worldwide

A coordinated online campaign has reportedly encouraged users to alter fuel station information on digital maps across Russia, creating confusion among drivers.

The activity involves changing station statuses by marking locations with available fuel as empty or showing closed stations as operational.

Supporters of the campaign claim the effort is designed to disrupt travel decisions, increase uncertainty, and create additional pressure around fuel availability.

Map manipulation campaign spreads through online communities

The campaign reportedly centres around a website known as "GdeBenz," which has attracted more than one million visitors since its launch.

Participants are encouraged to use VPN services while accessing mapping platforms, allowing them to contribute altered information from outside locations.

Some users have reportedly relied on free VPN services to access the campaign tools and participate without revealing their actual network locations.

The changes reportedly affect fuel station details seen by drivers relying on online navigation tools when searching for available supplies.

Some participants have shared instructions through social media platforms, encouraging others to join the activity and modify fuel station information in different Russian cities.

The campaign has been described by supporters as an online operation aimed at creating confusion rather than directly affecting fuel infrastructure itself.

Reports surrounding the activity have not independently verified the full scale of the disruptions or confirmed how many fuel stations were affected by altered map information.

However, the campaign shows how digital platforms can become another area of competition during ongoing geopolitical tensions, where information accuracy can influence everyday decisions.

Digital disruption creates uncertainty around fuel searches

The reported campaign relies on crowd participation rather than technical attacks against fuel companies or mapping providers, making it different from conventional cyber operations.

By changing publicly visible location data, participants attempt to influence how drivers interpret fuel availability before travelling to specific stations.

Such changes could potentially cause unnecessary journeys, increased fuel consumption, longer queues, and frustration among motorists if users encounter inaccurate information.

The activity has also drawn attention to how Russia VPN searches and related privacy tools can become part of wider online campaigns where participants attempt to bypass regional restrictions or conceal their locations.

Supporters have celebrated the effort as an example of collective online action, while independent assessments of its practical impact remain limited.

Whether altered map information can create significant disruption over time depends on how quickly platforms detect inaccurate updates and restore correct information.

The incident also shows how digital services used for routine tasks can become vulnerable to manipulation when large groups coordinate around a shared objective.

Via Alex Bond on X

Full text

Wall Street isn’t just betting on company performance anymore. It’s betting on Washington.

As investors hunt for the Trump administration’s next winner, they’re increasingly trying to anticipate which industries and companies will benefit from White House policy — from tariffs and export controls to procurement, subsidies and even presidential attention itself.

That has changed how investors think about risk. Beyond earnings and cash flow, they’re weighing which CEOs have the White House’s ear, whether a presidential announcement could transform a company’s prospects overnight, or whether a public falling-out could wipe out billions in market value.

“I’ve been doing this for 20 years, I’ve never seen it like this,” said Henrietta Treyz, co-founder and director of economic policy at Veda Partners, an investment advisory firm.

Treyz said clients now regularly ask whether industries ranging from copper to polysilicon are about to land on the administration’s radar, viewing government attention as a potential advantage but also a new source of risk.

Most recently, the White House has floated the idea of taking stakes in top AI companies, raising questions among Silicon Valley leaders and investors.

But that kind of intervention could distort the market, said Luigi Zingales, finance professor at the University of Chicago Booth School of Business. Markets work best, he said, when investors are rewarded for identifying the next breakthrough — not the next company to win political backing.

“We’re no longer trying to figure out what is the next good allocation of capital, we’re trying to figure out what is the allocation of capital most favored by President Trump,” said Zingales. “It’s a terrible sign of not only the market, but the economy.”

Intel has become Wall Street’s clearest example of that phenomenon.

When CEO Lip-Bu Tan made a last-minute trip to the White House last August, investors knew the meeting mattered. Just days earlier, President Donald Trump had publicly called for Tan to resign, alleging his ties to China made him unfit to lead one of America’s most important chipmakers. Yet Tan emerged from the meeting with the federal government set to own roughly 10 percent of Intel through a restructuring of its CHIPS Act support — a remarkable outcome for a publicly traded company. Since then, Intel’s shares have soared nearly 500 percent, although much of that gain could be due to the broader semiconductor boom.

“We shouldn’t over-index on the government investment in explaining why Intel’s stock is doing so well,” said Chris Miller, a Tufts Fletcher School professor and author of “Chip War.”

In June, Intel shares surged again after Trump announced that Apple would partner with the company to make chips in the U.S., saying his administration helped broker the deal. Neither Apple nor Intel has publicly confirmed the agreement, but the announcement further reinforced investors’ perception that Intel sits at the center of the administration’s industrial strategy.

For investors, the bigger question is whether Intel can sell more chips. Government signaling alone is rarely enough to sustain a rally unless it’s accompanied by policies that boost revenue, lower costs or improve a company’s outlook.

IBM could become the next test case. Its shares jumped roughly 42 percent in the days following the administration announced plans in May to back a new quantum chip foundry. Even after surrendering part of that rally, the stock remains more than 30 percent above its pre-announcement level.

The calculus is different in critical minerals, where the administration’s backing has come with policies that directly improve companies’ bottom lines rather than simply signaling confidence. Purchase guarantees, price floors and other forms of support aimed at reducing dependence on China have given investors reasons to expect higher revenue and lower risk, making government involvement a much stronger investment signal than an equity stake alone.

The administration’s deal last July with MP Materials crystallized that distinction for investors, combining an equity stake with long-term purchase commitments and price guarantees that directly strengthened the company’s economics.

“Not all the government equity stakes are created equally,” said Tobin Marcus, head of U.S. policy and politics at Wolfe Research. “Coming out of the MP Materials deal, there was a very active search for what subsequent investment might look like in that space.”

But there are areas, such as artificial intelligence, where government intervention could give investors pause.

AI technology is advancing rapidly, regulation remains in flux, and although the White House lifted export restrictions on Anthropic last week, the industry remains exposed to abrupt political intervention. Making the government a shareholder would inject an entirely new source of political risk into an industry already defined by uncertainty.

Unlike critical minerals, where government support comes with purchase guarantees and other tangible economic benefits, AI companies already enjoy strong investor demand and rapid growth. Several investors and policy experts said an equity stake alone would likely not help those companies’ fundamentals.

“If you look at Intel or the critical minerals sector, you have a national security need and a market failure where private investors don’t see the financial benefit, so it makes sense for the government to intervene,” said Dan McCarthy, a senior adviser at Veda Partners. “Those dynamics don’t exist with AI; these companies are already very successful.”

A government stake could also introduce regulatory uncertainty, investors said, because the same government investing in AI companies would also be writing the rules governing them.

“There’s intense debate about regulation right now, so I think government stakes in AI companies, if they materialize, are likely to be seen as a signal of political favor,” said Miller.

For investors trying to read Washington, the question is no longer just where the government intervenes — but whether political favor has become a market signal in its own right.

Full text

The patient: An 83-year-old man in Belgium

The symptoms: The man sought medical attention at a hospital because the muscles on one side of his face had weakened suddenly, causing it to droop — a condition called unilateral peripheral facial-nerve palsy. He had also recently had a fever, which had since resolved.

Tests run by the neurology department found the man had anemia , fatty liver disease and an enlarged spleen. Combined with his recent fever, these findings led the team to assume he had a viral infection. However, he tested negative for a variety of germs, including Epstein-Barr virus, which causes mono; cytomegalovirus; human immunodeficiency virus ( HIV ); and hepatitis A, B, C, and E.

The man's liver abnormalities hadn't resolved by one week later, but his facial-nerve palsy cleared following a 10-day course of a strong corticosteroid. But then, over the next month, the man's knees and ankles became stiff and painful, and his legs and feet — and occasionally his face, arms and hands — began to swell. He reported feeling generally unwell, he had gained 11 pounds (5 kilograms), and his urine had darkened even though he had been drinking more water than usual. All of these signs pointed to problems with his kidney function.

Besides the conditions uncovered on his recent medical examinations, the patient had long-standing high blood pressure, high cholesterol, an enlarged prostate and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), for which he was taking medications. He had also been diagnosed with rectal cancer 20 years beforehand and received various treatments over the years. He and his wife of 50 years had been sexually inactive since that cancer treatment, he told his doctors.

What happened next: After weeks spent in and out of the hospital, the man went to an emergency room after his skin suddenly became intensely itchy. He had a red, scaly rash on his calves. A neurological exam revealed "normal motor strength, sensation, reflexes, coordination, and gait," the doctors wrote in a report of the case .

At the ER, the patient was questioned further about his medical history, at which point he told doctors that, during his military service as a young man, he'd had unprotected sex with multiple casual partners. He reported being treated for various sexually transmitted infections (STIs) during that time but had forgotten the specific diagnoses.

Tests revealed that the patient was anemic and that his urine contained blood and an abnormal amount of protein. Additionally, a test for autoimmune diseases found abnormally high levels of antinuclear antibodies , which target the control centers of cells that house DNA. Because the patient had recently had facial-nerve palsy, the doctors analyzed his cerebral spinal fluid — the clear fluid that surrounds the brain and spinal cord. This revealed elevated levels of white blood cells, which hinted at an active infection.

The diagnosis: While tests for HIV and tuberculosis came back negative, an assay for Treponema pallidum , the bacterium that causes syphilis , was positive, confirming that the patient had an active syphilis infection.

Syphilis infections can progress through four stages , each with different symptoms. If an infected person doesn't get effective treatment during the primary and secondary stages, the bacteria can go latent, sometimes for decades. And in a minority of cases, latent syphilis can awaken and cause a late, or tertiary, infection.

A more recent, unreported exposure must be considered.

Based on his positive T. pallidum test, rash, general unwell feeling, abnormal liver results, high urinary protein count, leg swelling, facial drooping and swollen lymph nodes, the man's doctors diagnosed him with secondary syphilis with early neurosyphilis, in which the bacteria attack the nervous system.

The treatment: The patient had been given a single injection of penicillin before the test results confirmed that his infection had neurological involvement. He was subsequently given a 14-day course of intravenous penicillin, which is the recommended treatment for neurosyphilis, according to the case report.

The severe itching was treated with antihistamines, and he was prescribed diuretics to reduce the swelling in his legs. The rash, itching and swelling had improved by his one-month follow-up appointment, and his liver tests and urinary output had normalized.

Public health authorities were informed of the patient's diagnosis, and his wife was referred for testing. The case report does not note whether his wife tested positive for syphilis.

What makes the case unique: Secondary syphilis normally occurs within the first year of an untreated infection and only rarely develops after four years have passed. Normally, smooth, hard sores appear on the mouth or genitals during primary syphilis, and once those sores disappear, secondary syphilis sets in within months, if left untreated.

OTHER DILEMMAS

A toddler accidently ate gonorrhea bacteria from a lab dish

Man caught rabies from organ transplant after donor was scratched by skunk

Rare semen allergy may have caused woman's infertility

"Although the patient's history of multiple sexually transmitted infections as a young man prompted testing for syphilis, an exposure from that period would not be expected to explain his current presentation," his doctors wrote.

There's a possibility that the man had a latent infection that recently reactivated, perhaps due to the immune-suppressing effect of his recent steroid treatment. But you'd expect the reactivation to cause only symptoms of tertiary syphilis — like nervous system problems — not symptoms associated with secondary syphilis, like fever, rash and weight loss.

Therefore, exactly when the man contracted the infection is uncertain. "A more recent, unreported exposure must be considered," the doctors wrote.

It is also rare for syphilis to affect the liver and kidneys , occurring in less than 10% of cases, according to the case report.

For more intriguing medical cases, check out our Diagnostic Dilemma archives .

This article is for informational purposes only and is not meant to offer medical advice.

This article was first published Feb. 18, 2026.

Full text

Updates from the one-off women’s Test at Lord’s

Sign up for The Spin | Email James

15th over: England 38-3 (Sciver-Brunt 1, Capsey 5 ) Alice Capsey joins Sciver-Brunt in the middle with a rebuild job needed. Her first ball jags bag at the pads and she is fortunate to get an inside edge on it to tickle away for four runs. India have been on the money this morning, much more accurate than England’s seamers in the first 10-15 overs yesterday and they are reaping the rewards.

Huge wicket! Knight is done by one that moves up the hill and the umpire raises the finger! Knight reviews but she looks like she already knows her fate. Sure enough it is Umpires Call on the DRS and Knight has to go. England in strife!

Continue reading...