FlashFeed

Full text

Two 15-year-olds were seen hanging out of the Waymo’s windows.

The robotaxi autonomously pulled into a parking lot as police arrived.

Local police haven’t said if the two teenagers will be arrested.

Two teenagers learned the hard way that a robotaxi makes a lousy accomplice. The pair were arrested in San Mateo, California, earlier this week after it came out that they had allegedly been shooting Orbeez (water beads) and drinking alcohol in the back of one of Waymo’s self-driving vehicles, which promptly called police and parked in a lot until officers arrived. The snitch, it turns out, was the ride itself.

var adpushup = window.adpushup = window.adpushup || {que:[]};

adpushup.que.push(function() {

if (adpushup.config.platform !== "DESKTOP"){

adpushup.triggerAd("0f7e3106-c4d6-4db4-8135-c508879a76f8");

} else {

adpushup.triggerAd("82503191-e1d1-435a-874f-9c78a2a54a2f");

}

});

Local media reports place the two 15-year-olds in the Waymo on Monday afternoon, cruising the streets and leaning out the windows with realistic-looking guns as they allegedly fired small polymer Orbeez beads into the road.

Read: Waymo’s Self-Driving Cars Can’t Stop Diving Into Floods, So It Paused 5 Cities

It’s unclear how Waymo was first alerted to the teenagers, whether the vehicle flagged the activity on its own, whether the in-car cameras caught it and pinged the nearest command center, or whether a witness called it in. Whatever the case, Waymo pulled the vehicle into a parking lot so police could safely apprehend the duo.

var adpushup = window.adpushup = window.adpushup || {que:[]};

adpushup.que.push(function() {

if (adpushup.config.platform === "DESKTOP"){

adpushup.triggerAd("ea4d4b5a-f8e5-4d5d-9d9a-53a3b956b6cd");

} else{

adpushup.triggerAd("44c0a4dc-e25b-4ba5-ac64-2c510461b92a");

}

});

Waymo vehicles carry internal cameras and microphones that may be used in an emergency or to “promote safety and security,” per the company’s support page, though the firm says it does not use facial recognition or other biometric tools to identify riders.

The San Mateo Police Department responded and were shown approaching the driverless vehicle with their guns drawn prior to the arrests.

A Dramatic Arrest

“There was some ingenuity to this scheme, toy guns, water guns, and BB guns all pose real dangers, especially to an untrained eye,” police wrote in a Facebook post. “The simple handling of them can cause fear in passersby or to those who don’t get a good look. Shooting projectiles at speed can cause real damage. And let’s not forget the underage drinking. All bad ideas today for these two.”

The department also needled the pair with a note to parents, writing “Parents do you know where your teens are? Waymo does!” and conceded one point in their favor, that “The Waymo might have been the smartest idea yet, because driving impaired would’ve made this so much worse.”

var adpushup = window.adpushup = window.adpushup || {que:[]};

adpushup.que.push(function() {

if (adpushup.config.platform !== "DESKTOP"){

adpushup.triggerAd("bb7964e9-07de-4b06-a83e-ead35079d53c");

} else {

adpushup.triggerAd("9b1169d9-7a89-4971-a77f-1397f7588751");

}

});

Local authorities have yet to reveal whether the two teenagers have been charged in the case or have simply been warned not to do it again.

This incident comes several months after an unidentified Waymo rider used one of the self-driving robotaxis as a getaway vehicle after stealing several pieces of expensive activewear from the Hot 8 Yoga studio in San Francisco. In this case, Waymo had already deleted all footage of the man by the time it was contacted by police about the theft, so unlike these kids, he was able to get away.

var adpushup = window.adpushup = window.adpushup || {que:[]};

adpushup.que.push(function() {

if (adpushup.config.platform !== "DESKTOP"){

adpushup.triggerAd("bb7964e9-07de-4b06-a83e-ead35079d53c");

} else {

adpushup.triggerAd("9b1169d9-7a89-4971-a77f-1397f7588751");

}

});

San Mateo Police Department

Full text

A Molniya drone struck without any visible control antenna at all

Only a camera and computer were found inside the recovered drone

Ukraine believes navigation and targeting may now run without humans

A Russian Molniya drone recently struck a Ukrainian facility without a visible control antenna, and the strike appeared unusual to observers tracking the weapon's design.

The recovered drone carried only a camera and an onboard computer, a stripped configuration that suggests a move toward greater autonomy in strike sequences.

Radio technology specialist Serhii "Flash" Beskrestnov, an adviser to Ukraine's defence minister, said the finding points toward navigation and targeting functions operating without a human operator.

A familiar pattern from the V2U platform

The same onboard setup had previously appeared only on the V2U drone , a separate Russian platform used earlier in the conflict.

"The enemy is using the V2U platform to train its neural network," Beskrestnov wrote, adding that the repeated hardware marked a troubling development.

"The UAV had only a camera and a computer. This is where everything is heading. Navigation, target acquisition and the attack will become fully autonomous."

Ukraine's Defence Intelligence, through its War&Sanctions portal, already classifies the V2U as an AI-enabled loitering munition, though independent confirmation remains absent from other sources.

This overlap raises fresh questions about whether commercial processors, originally built for civilian robotics, are being repurposed for battlefield autonomy across programmes.

There are speculations that Russia's drone programme is drawing on Nvidia's Jetson Orin platform, a processor widely used in hobbyist and commercial drone projects for onboard image recognition.

That kind of chip could plausibly allow a drone to identify and track targets without needing constant external human guidance.

However, no independent laboratory analysis has publicly confirmed the specific chip inside the recovered Molniya drone.

That gap leaves the true source of the hardware unclear, and points to a wider question of how such components may be reaching Russian manufacturers at all.

COTS components complicate export controls

Russian reliance on commercial off-the-shelf, or COTS, hardware appears to expose a persistent gap in international sanctions enforcement efforts worldwide.

Such components are typically manufactured for civilian markets and often reach restricted buyers through intermediaries, complicating end-use verification across borders.

Once a chip like the Jetson Orin leaves its original supply chain, tracing its final destination becomes difficult for export control agencies to manage in practice.

Manufacturers rarely sell directly to sanctioned states, so a single chip can pass through several resellers before reaching its final buyer.

Each additional link in that chain makes it harder for regulators to know exactly where a processor ends up.

This loophole means sanctioned states can potentially acquire advanced processors meant for hobbyist or commercial use, then repurpose them for weapons development.

A chip designed for a drone hobbyist's camera rig can, in principle, end up guiding a loitering munition instead.

Closing that gap would likely require tighter monitoring of resellers and distributors rather than restrictions on the manufacturers themselves.

Export control regimes were largely built around large, traceable defence contracts rather than small consumer electronics shipments.

That mismatch leaves regulators several steps behind when commercial parts are diverted toward military applications.

Until distributors face stricter tracking requirements, similar hardware may keep surfacing in future weapons regardless of existing sanctions.

Via Ukrainska Pravda